![]() Operations considerations didn’t allow an SRX to be used which was unfortunate. There were some designs where I ended up having to put a router behind the firewall or in front of it due to the fact BGP was a requirement. I am sure they lost many a deal to Juniper’s SRX over this. There has been many a discussion surrounding how could Cisco not support this on ASA for so long. The most notable feature of this product release is BGP support. The release of this Virtual Appliance is in alignment with a new code release. Removing its underlying dependency on Nexus 1000v, this fully functioning Virtual Appliance faithfully reproduces a vast majority of the ASA’s features and expands the ASAs use case portfolio. Now with that said the Cisco ASA 1000v has been superseded by the Cisco ASAv during the week. The problem with this Virtual Appliance is that it required a Nexus 1000v. For a long time the Cisco ASA has been a physical firewall and recently evolved to a Virtual Appliance known as the ASA 1000v. The other day marked a pretty big security release for Cisco. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |